in

The Yamaha Road Star Warrior Forum

The #1 site for the Yamaha Road Star Warrior

Raider or Harley, best looking?

Last post 11-05-2009 12:47 PM by gowen. 92 replies.
Page 5 of 7 (93 items) « First ... < Previous 3 4 5 6 7 Next >
Sort Posts: Previous Next
  • 11-01-2009 7:41 AM In reply to

    Re: Raider or Harley, best looking?

    DarkStar:
    By far the HD looks better then the picture of the Raider.
     

    In what respect?  The spindly front forks?  The bicycle front tire?  The untreated engine metal?  The lack of an effective braking system?

    C'mon Dark give us a few specifics.  I'm really interested in what people see in that Harley, beyond maybe the shiney rims.  

    Men, it has been well said, think in herds; it will be seen that they go mad in herds, while they only recover their senses slowly, and one by one.
    --Charles Mackay
  • Sponsored Links

  • 11-01-2009 7:46 AM In reply to

    Re: Raider or Harley, best looking?

    saddlebagus:

    DarkStar:
    Yes, they are mounted to the swingarm......Why would that be a concern?
     

    Because the swingarm bounces up and down with the road while the rest of your pillion is happily damped by a shock absorber leaving her feet experience the joy of every piece of gravel on the road.  This can be minimized by mounting the pegs as close to the swingarm pivot as possible, but still.  Do you own a Harley Dyna model?

     

    hahaha!  That just sounds stupid.  Because it is.  Those pegs are mounted so close to the pivot point of the swingarm that I'll bet they don't move more than 1/4 inch up and down at the MOST, probably about 1/8 of an inch if that.  Every piece of gravel on the road?  I suppose you would feel a pea under your mattress, too?  Ick!Indifferent

    ---
    "He who rides fastest, rides alone."
    Do what you gotta do, and THEN do what you wanna do.
    If you ain't cheatin' then you ain't tryin'.
    Windshields are for cars.

  • 11-01-2009 7:49 AM In reply to

    Re: Raider or Harley, best looking?

    saddlebagus:

    DarkStar:
    By far the HD looks better then the picture of the Raider.
     

    In what respect?  The spindly front forks?  The bicycle front tire?  The untreated engine metal?  The lack of an effective braking system?

    C'mon Dark give us a few specifics.  I'm really interested in what people see in that Harley, beyond maybe the shiney rims.  

     

    No, you're not.  You're just showing your ass at this point and you know it.  And you misspelled "shiny."   Devil

    ---
    "He who rides fastest, rides alone."
    Do what you gotta do, and THEN do what you wanna do.
    If you ain't cheatin' then you ain't tryin'.
    Windshields are for cars.

  • 11-01-2009 8:46 AM In reply to

    Re: Raider or Harley, best looking?

    Shag:

    saddlebagus:

    DarkStar:
    Yes, they are mounted to the swingarm......Why would that be a concern?
     

    Because the swingarm bounces up and down with the road while the rest of your pillion is happily damped by a shock absorber leaving her feet experience the joy of every piece of gravel on the road.  This can be minimized by mounting the pegs as close to the swingarm pivot as possible, but still.  Do you own a Harley Dyna model?

     

    hahaha!  That just sounds stupid.  Because it is.  Those pegs are mounted so close to the pivot point of the swingarm that I'll bet they don't move more than 1/4 inch up and down at the MOST, probably about 1/8 of an inch if that.  Every piece of gravel on the road?  I suppose you would feel a pea under your mattress, too?  Ick!Indifferent

    How about the Unsprung weigh? But if the pegs work 4 U on the swing arm....

    I like the Look of the Raider...

    I also like the Soft Tail Springer SE.... Changed it up with some cam..Wow I bet U will look Soooooooo Coooool right up to the time the week case on the 110 lets go....Harley was just waiting 4 U to do that so they don't need to Honor the warranty....YesCool 

  • 11-01-2009 8:58 AM In reply to

    Re: Raider or Harley, best looking?

    warriordude:

    How about the Unsprung weigh? But if the pegs work 4 U on the swing arm....

     

     

    Hmmm...  Mine didn't seem to slow me down any when I was smoking that Warrior twice in a row with my Harley.  SurpriseStick out tongueDevil  I think I might have even mentioned that on this forum at some time in the past.  Cool  HO HO HO!!!

    ---
    "He who rides fastest, rides alone."
    Do what you gotta do, and THEN do what you wanna do.
    If you ain't cheatin' then you ain't tryin'.
    Windshields are for cars.

  • 11-01-2009 8:59 AM In reply to

    Re: Raider or Harley, best looking?

     Ahh, how refreshing.  Nice to see the Harley "experts" out in force on this thread.  Too bad they don't sh*t about the bikesYes

    Wera Expert#138

    Ride what you like!
  • 11-01-2009 9:30 AM In reply to

    Re: Raider or Harley, best looking?



    The government cannot give to anybody anything that the government does not first take from somebody else.



    Μολών Λαβέ
  • 11-01-2009 10:06 AM In reply to

    • OldMan
    • Top 10 Contributor
    • Joined on 05-07-2003
    • Wasilla AK USA
    • Posts 8,697
    • GoldSupporter

    Re: Raider or Harley, best looking?

    DarkStar:
      Yes, they are mounted to the swingarm......Why would that be a concern? Never put any thought into where passenger pegs should be mounted or not. I would like to hear your thoughts on the mounting location. They work well where they are located comfort wise for passenger.

    Wow, you guys are sure defensive.  I asked if they were mounted on the swingarm, that's all.  My eyes aren't all that good and the pic is small so I couldn't tell. I was curious OK?   I don't recall ever having a bike with them on the swing arm.  That doesn't mean I haven't had one, just that I don't remember it if I have.   But yeah, now that it has been brought up, it doesn't seem like an ideal location.

    jc - Oldman Infidel
    Wasilla, Alaska Agent Orange Test Subject B931474
    Opinions expressed are my own.
    (UNLESS offensive or stupid, in which case
    they have been posted by a clever imposter.)
  • 11-01-2009 10:11 AM In reply to

    Re: Raider or Harley, best looking?

    madav8tr:

     Ahh, how refreshing.  Nice to see the Harley "experts" out in force on this thread.  Too bad they don't sh*t about the bikesYes

    ya know at the beginning of this thread, you didn't even need to know anything about bikes, just had to have a simple opinion on which one of two you liked the look of best. but it would seem that by the mir fact that one is a Harley ,seem to bring out the  fear? envy? hatred?  i don't know what it is. i would bet if it was a triumph instead of a Harley ,responses would have not been so heated. why some of you Hate a motorcycle in Public is beyond me

       DS my response to the peg mount was based on a different forum discussion complaining about the comfort due to that location, although my wife only mentions the stock seat and not pegs.........and i just walked home from a neighborhood Halloween party and my judgment might have been "slightly impaired"

    INJEKTER
  • 11-01-2009 10:58 AM In reply to

    Re: Raider or Harley, best looking?

    Shag:
    No, you're not.  You're just showing your ass at this point and you know it. 

    http://www.motorcyclecruiser.com/roadtests/2006_harley_davidson_fxdwgi_dyna_wide_glide/index.html

    "The passenger pegs are mounted on the front of the swingarm, so bumps come through more solidly than if they were attached to a totally sprung part of the bike."

    And why so defensive?  I don't hate your Harley.  Darkstar asked a question and I answered with the design disadvantages pointed out by virtually ever review I've read on the new Dyna line.

    Shag:
    And you misspelled "shiny."  
     

    Forgive me, Mr Shag, I don't do "shiny."

     

     

    Men, it has been well said, think in herds; it will be seen that they go mad in herds, while they only recover their senses slowly, and one by one.
    --Charles Mackay
  • 11-01-2009 11:03 AM In reply to

    Re: Raider or Harley, best looking?

    madav8tr:
     Ahh, how refreshing.  Nice to see the Harley "experts" out in force on this thread.  Too bad they don't sh*t about the bikesYes

    Ahh, how refreshing.  Nice to see the Harley "apoligizers" correcting all the misinformation and leading us to a better understanding of the bikesYes

    Men, it has been well said, think in herds; it will be seen that they go mad in herds, while they only recover their senses slowly, and one by one.
    --Charles Mackay
  • 11-01-2009 12:02 PM In reply to

    Re: Raider or Harley, best looking?

    saddlebagus:

    Shag:
    No, you're not.  You're just showing your ass at this point and you know it. 

    http://www.motorcyclecruiser.com/roadtests/2006_harley_davidson_fxdwgi_dyna_wide_glide/index.html

    "The passenger pegs are mounted on the front of the swingarm, so bumps come through more solidly than if they were attached to a totally sprung part of the bike."

    And why so defensive?  I don't hate your Harley.  Darkstar asked a question and I answered with the design disadvantages pointed out by virtually ever review I've read on the new Dyna line.

     

     

    Even you are not that stupid...  I hope.  You know good and damn well that you were simply being a smartass in your reply commenting about the bicycle front wheel, blah blah, etc etc. Nothing more than that.  Just being a smartass.  You could at least admit it and not ALSO become a damn liar.  

     

    ---
    "He who rides fastest, rides alone."
    Do what you gotta do, and THEN do what you wanna do.
    If you ain't cheatin' then you ain't tryin'.
    Windshields are for cars.

  • 11-01-2009 12:36 PM In reply to

    Re: Raider or Harley, best looking?

    OldMan:

    DarkStar:
      Yes, they are mounted to the swingarm......Why would that be a concern? Never put any thought into where passenger pegs should be mounted or not. I would like to hear your thoughts on the mounting location. They work well where they are located comfort wise for passenger.

    Wow, you guys are sure defensive.  I asked if they were mounted on the swingarm, that's all.  My eyes aren't all that good and the pic is small so I couldn't tell. I was curious OK?   I don't recall ever having a bike with them on the swing arm.  That doesn't mean I haven't had one, just that I don't remember it if I have.   But yeah, now that it has been brought up, it doesn't seem like an ideal location.

    Defensive? No where in my reply to you was I being even remotely defensive. Just incase you did not read my statement correctly. I never put any thought into the location of the passenger pegs and was curious on your thoughts. That is a all simple question........getting overly sensitive in your old age.Wink There you go a winky so you know I am just kidding.


  • 11-01-2009 1:12 PM In reply to

    Re: Raider or Harley, best looking?

    Shag:
    You know good and damn well that you were simply being a smartass in your reply commenting about the bicycle front wheel, blah blah,

    Aha, so that's why you're so touchy.  Your Harley doesn't have a bicycle tire or spindly forks, so why sweat it?

    Shag:
    Just being a smartass.  You could at least admit it
     

    Okay, so I admit I may have used a euphemism or two to make my point.  But really, look at small diameter forks on the Harley vs the Raider or even compare their front 21" tires, the Raider with a wide, low profile, modern rubber and the Harley with a tire that appears designed around the time of the Big Bopper.

    I got nothing against Harleys in general Shagadoodle. I just don't see the appeal of the one originally posted.

    Men, it has been well said, think in herds; it will be seen that they go mad in herds, while they only recover their senses slowly, and one by one.
    --Charles Mackay
  • 11-01-2009 1:40 PM In reply to

    Re: Raider or Harley, best looking?

    most of this bull doesnt matter because the question is looks not how it works or runs and so on. they both sell they are both put to good use im sure and if you fall off of either one at 40mph you will more the likely need more then a bandaid.dont like the hd dont buy it, dont like the raider dont buy it, buying owning and what they are all about is not the issue , looks was the question.   btk572 

Page 5 of 7 (93 items) « First ... < Previous 3 4 5 6 7 Next >
Home | Forums | Photos | News | Classifieds | Warrior of the Month | Contact Us | About Us | Donate | Advertise | Legal & Privacy | Rules
©2002-2009 RSWarrior.com. All rights reserved.
Site created and maintained by Sean Kearney